in your text about the logics of
explorational illusions you state some
nonsensical considerations, which - in an utterly
disconnected way -
seem even more delirious in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous farfetched talks
you held on subjects like autonomous intelligence, your findings appear (not only to me) like inconsequential presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the illogical depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state inconsequential ideas and their absurd connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)